根据下面资料，回答36-40题 As Congress aims to pass another coronavirus
单选
根据下面资料，回答36-40题
As Congress aims to pass another coronavirus relief package, the Trump administration and Republicans on Capitol Hill are insisting on a reduction to the weekly federal unemployment insurance benefit, arguing that the extra $ 600 a week that Congress provided for the jobless has created a disincentive for people to go back to work. They want to reduce the boost to only $ 200 a week. It's an incredibly bad idea, based on deceptive logic and stereotypes.
Extending the benefit at $ 600 is needed to combat the persistently high unemployment rate and to prevent an even worse economic collapse. Indeed, putting money directly into the pockets of Americans is one of the most important steps Congress can take to contain the economic fallout from COVID-19. Providing Americans with more money not only helps to keep millions of families out of poverty but also ensures that people keep spending money, Which is crucial if businesses are to stay afloat.
The concern that generous unemployment insurance benefits might disincentivize work may seem to have a superficial logic. After all, more than two-thirds of Americans who qualify for unemployment stand to make more money than they did when they worked. But that line of reasoning is flawed.
First, even if the weekly $ 600 financial assistance is extended, workers receiving the benefit know it will eventually expire. There is already evidence that Americans have been returning to work in spite of receiving an additional $ 600 each week for being unemployed：Both May and June saw record-breaking numbers with regard to jobs added, and the unemployment rate declined during that period.
Second, workers who fail to look for work or turn down job offers risk losing their unemployment benefit. While the CARES Act—which created the weekly $ 600 aid for unemployed workers—expanded the acceptable causes for refusing to go back to work while still qualifying for unemployment benefits, people still have to provide a valid public-health reason for not returning to work. That's also the reason the unemployment benefit is generous：It gives workers the opportunity to stay at home in order to contain the spread of the coronavirus without causing their households extreme financial stress.
And third, the reason the unemployment numbers are so high is because there simply aren't enough jobs to go around. Arindrajit Dube, a professor of economics, said, "In a very down labor market, incentivizing people to search harder is self-defeating. "
Is it possible that there will be a few cases where people choose not to return to work because the unemployment benefit is higher than their wages? Of course. But that number will be negligible. "These risks are so small compared to the really big risk, which is that all of these people are going to cut back on spending when they lose that benefit," Dube, said. "And that is going to be yet another unforced error in the set of many unforced errors that our government has done in handling this pandemic. "
The Trump administration is seeking to______
